• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Call Us Today: 610-692-5770

Serving PA, NJ, DE, NY & Beyond

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Brickhouse Environmental

Brickhouse Environmental

Sound Science. Trusted Advice.

  • Home
  • About Us
    • History
    • Principal Bios
    • Senior Management Staff
    • Careers
    • Giving Back
    • The Golden Brick
  • Services
    • Site Remediation
    • Environmental Due Diligence
    • Solid Waste Management
    • PFAS
    • Water Resource Management
    • Expert Testimony/Litigation Support
    • Heating Oil Clean-ups
    • Risk Assessment
    • Industrial Compliance
  • Projects
    • Gallery
  • News
    • Technical Articles
  • Resources
  • Contact Us
    • Request Brickhouse Vault Access

Industrial Compliance

January Newsletter – New Year, New Successes, New Water Rules

January 22, 2019

Top Stories – What’s New in 2019 ?

New Year, New Successes

New water rules or criteria weren’t the only thing the new year brought us.  The hard work and efforts made during last year have paid off- In 2019, Brickhouse welcomes good news and wishes to congratulate our valued staff on their various career successes.

Long-time employee and registered Professional Geologist (P.G.), Douglas Schott, has now added another state of licensure to his resumé: New York. Having been registered in the state of Pennsylvania and Delaware for over ten years, he has now completed the requirements for P.G. status in New York State. Congratulations Doug!

Registered Professional Geologist, Jeffrey Christopher, recently succeeded in the rigorous Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) testing. Each Year, New Jersey accepts only a small number of candidates for testing, of which number, even fewer are chosen to be licensed. We are extremely proud of Jeff, who is now an LSRP in the state of New Jersey. Way to go Jeff!

Stephen Huxta is now a registered Professional Geologist and holds a Masters Degree in Hydrogeology from the University of Pennsylvania. We heartily congratulate Steve, who has been with Brickhouse Environmental since the start of his professional career and has worked hard every single day. Excellent work Steve!

We are proud of our staff and look forward to a bright year ahead!

NJDEP Proposes New Interim Ground Water Quality Criteria For PFOA and PFOS

NJDEP Proposes New Interim Ground Water Quality Criteria For PFOA and PFOS

On January 18, 2019, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) announced proposed interim ground water quality criteria for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), emerging contaminants that are extremely persistent in the environment.

The DEP has developed draft interim criteria of 10 parts per trillion for each of these chemicals, lower than current standards or guidelines in any other state. The DEP has requested public input through Feb. 19, with the goal of making these interim criteria effective within the next several months. These criteria will remain in effect on an interim basis, until the DEP adopts formal rules setting formal standards for ground water and drinking water.

The interim ground water criteria will be used by the DEP, parties conducting remediation, and Licensed Site Remediation Professionals in making decisions about ground water remediation strategies in impacted areas. These criteria will also apply to regulated dischargers to ground water, including industries.

For more information on NJDEP’s Request for Public Input, go to:
https://www.state.nj.us/dep/newsrel/2019/19_0006.htm

New Water Rule
New Water Rule from EPA

The 2018 Clean Water Rule eliminates the significant nexus determination, streamlining the jurisdictional review process and allowing land use decisions to be made without employing a team of lawyers to determine what puddles can be filled without a permit. The 2018 Rule provides a clearer demarcation of federal jurisdiction of waters and wetlands without hindering the rights of states to implement protections for other waters.

Since the passage of the federal Clean Water Act of 1972, filling of “waters of the United States” without a permit has been prohibited. The Act specifically mentions navigable waters and territorial seas, but the EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers quickly expanded the working definition of “waters of the United States” to include tributaries to such waters, as well as adjacent wetlands. Because the Act failed to provide a definition of “waters of the United States,” the EPA, the Army Corps of Engineers, landowners, and the courts have struggled to agree on what other waters are covered by the permit requirement. Since 1977, Brickhouse Environmental has been helping land owners and developers navigate the ever-changing rules and regulations.

In 1985 (US v. Riverside Bayview Homes), the Supreme Court ruled that the Army Corps was reasonable in expanding jurisdiction to cover wetlands adjacent to “waters of the United States.” In 2001, following further expansion, the Supreme Court held that the Army Corps could not reasonably claim jurisdiction over isolated wetlands based on their use by migratory birds (SWANCC v. US Army Corps of Engineers). In 2005, the Court created a standard to determine whether an isolated wetland had a “significant nexus” to “waters of the United States” before the Army Corps could claim jurisdiction (Rapanos v. US).

In 2015, in an attempt to clarify the definition and address the findings of Rapanos, the EPA issued a Clean Water Rule: Definition of “Waters of the United States.” The 2015 Clean Water Rule greatly expanded the scope of jurisdiction to include not only traditionally navigable waters, their tributaries and adjacent wetlands, and any other water that could be shown to have a “significant nexus” to other waters of the United States, but also included isolated waters, such as prairie potholes, Carolina bays, and vernal pools. The significant nexus determination would be case specific and could be interpreted to include ephemeral drainage ways that only see flow during rain events, and, in the extreme, could include sheet flow as well as channelized flow. The 2015 definition was immediately challenged and is still in legal limbo, in effect in 22 states (including PA, MD, DE, NJ, and NY), with the remaining states still operating under prior rules.

In 2017, the EPA issued notice to repeal the 2015 Rule and in December 2018, issued a revised Clean Water Rule with six categories of “waters of the United States:”

1. Traditionally navigable waters (rivers, canals, lakes, and seas used in interstate and foreign commerce)
2. Tributaries to navigable waters with intermittent or perennial flow
3. Ditches that meet the conditions of navigable waters or tributaries
4. Lakes and ponds that meet the conditions of navigable waters or that contribute intermittent or perennial flow to downstream waters
5. Impoundments of other waters of the US
6.Wetlands that physically touch other waters of the US, or that have a surface water connection in a typical year to other waters of the US

Excluded are groundwater, ephemeral features and stormwater runoff, ditches that are not navigable or are not themselves tributaries, prior converted cropland, artificially irrigated areas, artificial lakes and ponds constructed in uplands, depressions created in uplands incidental to mining or construction, stormwater control features constructed in uplands, wastewater recycling structures in uplands, waste treatment systems, and any other waters or water features not specifically listed as “waters of the United States.”

Following publication of the 2018 Clean Water Rule in the Federal Register, the EPA and Army Corps will be accepting public comments for a period of 60 days. More information can be found at https://www.epa.gov/wotus-rule.

If you have any questions about wetland delineation for your site or project, or need a Professional Geologist, Engineer, or Licensed Site Remediation Professional, please contact us at 610-692-5770.

<nsbp;>

Filed Under: Industrial Compliance, Technical Articles, Water

November Newsletter – More Ethanol in Gas?, The Golden Brick, & Drones

November 1, 2018

Top Stories
Gas Station Dispenser Island
More or Less Ethanol in Gasoline? Pros and Cons for the Environment

Gasoline and its additives have historically been a hot topic in the environmental arena, and they have recently made headlines again with the proposed increase of ethanol use in our gasoline. Throughout the years, changes to gasoline additives have improved our vehicle mileage, reduced emissions to the air, and have at least tried to align with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) mission to protect human health and the environment. But they have also left behind some interesting fingerprints, especially at soil and groundwater cleanup sites.

Changes in Gasoline Additives Over Time

Gasoline additives have been in use since the 1920s. Lead was added to gasoline as far back as the 1920s, as an alternative fuel to reduce “knocking,” boost octane, and prevent the buildup of deposits within the engine. Lead was phased out in the 1980s, due to identified adverse health risks. In 1990, Amendments to the Clean Air Act required the use of oxygenated gasoline in areas with unhealthy levels of air pollution. As a result, between 1992 and 2005, Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) became the oxygenating additive of choice,but it was later found to have detrimental effects to groundwater from emissions and/or spills, due to its high solubility and resistance to biodegradation. As a result, MTBE was phased out and replaced with Ethanol, which is a corn-based additive that provides the beneficial oxygenation required by the Clean Air Act, while also meeting federal requirements for renewable fuels.

Ethanol – “E10” vs. “E15”

Since the 1970s, when oil became more expensive and subject to international disputes – and as worries rose about the environmental damage caused by fossil fuels – the U.S. government has used various policy incentives to encourage the use of ethanol and other environmentally friendly supplements to gasoline. As a result, ethanol reportedly makes up about 10 percent of current U.S. gasoline usage.

For several years, Federal regulations have allowed the sale of ethanol-containing fuels with up to 15 percent ethanol (known as “E15”). However, most U.S. service stations only provide “E10,” because the more corrosive E15 can cause damage to older model cars. There has been much debate over the pros and cons of E10 versus E15, as many say that E10 provides sufficient oxygenation to make gasoline burn more cleanly and reduce air pollution. And, while it might be assumed that E15 would be better for air quality, the EPA currently blocks the sale of E15 from June 1 to September 15 in areas where smog is a problem, due to the volatility of the fuel, and the greater evaporation of gas during those warmer periods possibly causing more smog. Still, with the overall push for alternative fuels, the changing design of cars to handle the fuels, and a nod to the corn farmers in the Midwest, we may be seeing E15 more widely available in the near future.

Increased Ethanol Creates Unexpected Challenges at Cleanup Sites

An interesting side effect of ethanol use is also being discovered at petroleum cleanup sites. The subsurface geochemistry at a site is a key factor in assessing the source of a release, the speed and extent of contaminant migration, and appropriate cleanup options. Additives such as lead and MTBE have always provided clues as to the age, degradation, and source of releases. But now, in addition to differentiating fuel sources, environmental scientists are recognizing the impact that higher versus lower percentages of ethanol can have on subsurface geochemistry at spill sites, and that ethanol can actually create conditions for increased mobilization of contaminants in the environment. More specifically, studies indicate that ethanol significantly increases the solubility of petroleum constituents in water, which can have several effects at spill sites:

  • Once released to the subsurface, greater percentages of contaminants (benzene, etc.) can dissolve into the groundwater, resulting in larger dissolved plumes, with faster and further plume migration.
  • When ethanol fuels encounter older, residual petroleum in soils, the previously sorbed residuals can be remobilized by contact with the ethanol, and flushed toward the water table.
  • Ethanol inhibits the natural biodegradation of petroleum contaminants, especially BTEX, due to the preferential degradation of the ethanol.

The net effect is less natural attenuation, and increased dissolution and migration of gasoline constituents in groundwater. And the higher the ethanol concentrations, the greater the effects.

The Golden Brick…
For years, many of the staff at Brickhouse have insisted that they are more than just experts in science and engineering — that they also have an artistic and creative side. Now, they finally have a chance to prove it — in the Brickhouse Environmental Monthly Photo Contest!!Each month, all members of the Brickhouse team are invited to capture and submit their best images from the field, the office, or anywhere else along their daily travels. At the end of each month, all staff anonymously vote for their favorite image. The winner receives a gift card and… “The [coveted] Golden Brick,” to proudly display as a testament to their achievement. Said contest creator Cherie E.: “This contest not only gives us all a chance to unleash our pent-up creative and artistic sides, but also to share with the world some of our cultural and day-to-day experiences that make Brickhouse so enjoyable.”

The inaugural winning photo is also featured on the homepage of our website- click here to see September’s winner: http://bhe.integral.support/.

Environmental Applications of Drones
Drones are everywhere these days! They’re in your child’s hands, on the battlefield, doing great things, or getting their owners in trouble. Speaking of great things…environmental scientists, consulting firms, and private industry are putting them to work in all sorts of creative and useful ways. New instrumentation is continually being developed to further expand the usefulness of this (relatively) new research tool in the realm of environmental and geologic site investigation.Brickhouse Environmental recently had the opportunity to attend a 1-day seminar presented by the Pennsylvania Council of Professional Geologists (www.PCPG.org), geared toward the use of drones by geologic and environmental professionals. Presenters from West Chester University and Groundwater and Environmental Services, Inc. provided us with a very informative, hands-on experience that got us thinking more seriously about the applications of this technology and how it could benefit our clients. When I think of drones, I think of aerial photography and video. While this is one of the more common applications, advances in imagery collection and processing have turned pretty pictures into 3 dimensional georeferenced models, that can be manipulated in a variety of ways to rapidly gather and process site elevation data. Beyond aerial imagery collection, the capabilities of drones are only limited by the instrumentation they can carry. The following is just a sampling of the types of data that can be obtained by drones through the addition of specific cameras, sensors, and instrumentation: LiDAR imagery, radiological activity, gas composition, infrared imagery, meteorological information, and geophysical data.

These advances in drone capable instrumentation are creating ways for drones and their onboard technologies to be applied throughout our industry to the benefit of our clients and the regulated community. Here is a just a sample of these applications:

  • High resolution topographic and aerial photographic surveys can be obtained and processed quickly and cost effectively for use in complex environmental due diligence, land redevelopment, landfill volume calculations, pipeline/stream surveys, facility infrastructure inspection, etc.
  • Geophysical instrumentation can be flown over large areas to survey for buried metallic objects or debris (e.g. drums, underground tanks, pipelines, etc.).
  • A variety of gas monitoring equipment can be drone-mounted, allowing large areas to be quickly surveyed at a safe distance.
  • Remediation sites that involve contaminated groundwater discharges to surface water bodies can be challenging to fully characterize. It is possible with drone-mounted infrared cameras to locate these groundwater discharges along stream embankments with pinpoint accuracy.

While they look like big toys and can be seriously fun, they’re also seriously useful and economical, considering the potential overall benefit they can bring to a project. The quantity of quality data that can be obtained per dollar is significantly higher than other more conventional means of environmental and geologic data collection. While the use of drones is not applicable to all projects, their list of capabilities is continually expanding as technology advances.</

If you have any questions about drone applications for your site or project, please contact us.

<nsbp;>

Filed Under: Brickhouse, Industrial Compliance, Technical Articles

Primary Sidebar

Stay Informed

Thanks for signing up!

To stay informed and up to date on important regulations, technical guidance, and news, please join our email list

 

Our Services

Site Remediation
Environmental Due Diligence
Solid Waste Management
Industrial Compliance
Water Resource Management
Expert Testimony & Litigation Support
Heating Oil Clean-ups
Risk Assessment

Contact Us

515 South Franklin Street
West Chester, PA 19382
610-692-5770 (Phone)
610-692-8650 (Fax)
brickhouse@brickhouse-environmental.com

Testimonials

Michael, I am so pleased with the response time, and thoughtfulness of your effort and Brickhouse in general. I wasted a LOT of time with other environmental companies. I guess it’s never too late. I plan on working for another 20+ years. Both you and Doug have been fantastic.

Jack B.
 

Dave, Very solid and professional work Dave. Thank you for everything.

– Dan W.
 

Paul, Thanks for your excellent work and planning for this. Glad it is done!

– Phillip R.
 

Your field staff were awesome. Steve is especially sharp and communicates well with the client and attorneys.
The whole crew inspired confidence, and made a strong impression that Brickhouse is a quality outfit.

– Sam C. and Mark R.
 

Excellent job to all at Brickhouse! Yet another successful project, nice work! Thank you.

– Scott E.
 

The loan went through! Thanks for all that you have done for us, you did an amazing job!!!

– Pete S.
 

We officially sold the home. We thank you and appreciate what you have done to ease the transition. Your expertise is duly noted and it was nice working with you.

– Joseph P.
 

It was a pleasure working with you guys… I will definitely call again when we run into any environmental issues on our projects.

– Steven O.
 

You did an absolutely incredible job. I am so impressed by the level of detail in the report. Thank you so very much.

– David T.
 

Thanks Paul and company, great job.

– Richard B.
 

Your work has been excellent and I will be very happy to continue our relationship going forward.

– Gordon M.
 

Thanks for the status updates, I got out there as they were working on the newly uncovered well. Nice guys out there, personable and professional.

– Gary P.
 

Thank you very much for your assistance in my tank removal project. Your managers and field crew were a pleasure to work with.

– Chris M.
 

Thanks Michael, you did a fantastic job on this report, and made my life a lot easier.

– Brian B.
 

Thanks so much for your continued great work on this project. We are impressed with your work.

– Michael H.
 

Dave Farrington and Brickhouse have worked with Action Manufacturing Company as consultants on our Environmental projects with excellent results.

– Randy A.
 

I want to thank you and Brickhouse for your help throughout this process. I will recommend you to everyone that requires environmental services. Your company is truly professional. Thanks again.

– Tommy M.
 

Thanks Dave. Outstanding effort by you and your team in getting this done.

– Richard F.
 

I just heard from my colleagues in Philadelphia about the case.  They had nothing but praise for the effort your firm contributed.  Thanks for stepping up to this project at the last minute.

– John C.
 
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
Serving PA, NJ, DE, NY & Beyond

Copyright © 2023 · Brickhouse Environmental